Bibliography
Bibliography
Adams, T.E., Ellis, C. and Jones, S.H. (2017) ‘Autoethnography’, The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, pp. 1–11. doi:10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011.
Barnett, S. (2023) ChatGPT is making universities rethink plagiarism, Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-college-university-plagiarism/ (Accessed: 19 November 2023).
Beyond Chatgpt (2023) Centre for Teaching and Learning. Available at: https://www.ctl.ox.ac.uk/beyond-chatgpt (Accessed: 18 January 2024).
Compton, M. (2023) Evolving AI Literacy A Shared Journey, https://mcompton.uk/2023/11/29/evolving-ai-literacy-a-shared-journey/. Available at: https://mcompton.uk/2023/11/29/evolving-ai-literacy-a-shared-journey/.
Ellie, E. (2022) The potential of artificial intelligence in assessment feedback, Times Higher Education (THE). Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/potential-artificial-intelligence-assessment-feedback (Accessed: 19 November 2023).
Gerritson, J. (2023) ‘Using AI to mark pupils’ work can be unfair and discriminatory – education ministry’, RNZ News, 31 May. Available at: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/491047/using-ai-to-mark-pupils-work-can-be-unfair-and-discriminatory-education-ministry#:~:text=31%20May%202023-,Using%20AI%20to%20mark%20pupils’%20work%20can,unfair%20and%20discriminatory%20%2D%20education%20ministry&text=The%20Education%20Ministry%20has%20warned,discriminatory%20or%20just%20plain%20wrong. (Accessed: 15 November 2023).
Gray, C. and Malins, J. (2004) ‘Chapter 5: Intepreting the map: methods of evaluation and analysis’, in Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and Design. Burlington: Ashgate.
Hahn Tapper, A.J. (2013). A Pedagogy of Social Justice Education: Social Identity Theory, Intersectionality, and Empowerment. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 30(4), pp.411–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21072.
Healy, M. (2023) ‘Approaches to generative artificial intelligence, a social justice perspective’, SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4544617.
How are university students using AI (no date). UAL. Available at: https://ual.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Embed.aspx?id=60c8c1cd-955e-477f-a8a4-b09a00d9a1c2 (Accessed: 14 January 2024).
Innovative Digital Assessments (no date) Centre for Innovation in Education – University of Liverpool. Available at: https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/centre-for-innovation-in-education (Accessed: 19 November 2023).
Kumar, R. (2023) ‘Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: A case of implications’, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1). doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7.
Mathers, N.J., Fox, N.J. and Hunn, A. (1998) Using interviews in a research project. NHS Executive, Trent.
Shahrokh, Z.D. (2019) A short introduction to comparative research , ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/ (Accessed: 19 November 2023).
Silver, H.F. (2010) Compare & Contrast: Teaching comparative thinking to strengthen student learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
What makes good feedback (no date) What Makes Good Feedback | Learning and Teaching @ Newcastle | Newcastle University. Available at: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/learning-and-teaching/effective-practice/assessment/good-feedback/ (Accessed: 14 January 2024).
‘AI Conversations’ (no date) in. London: UAL.
‘International Symposium on ChatGPT and the Future of Learning: Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges in Higher Education’ (2023) in. Bahrain: Gulf University.